The Leadership and Learning Blog

Douglas B. Reeves, Ph.D.
11/21/2011
  1. by: Blog Posts
  2. by: Instruction

Question: We are running some professional development sessions on argumentative writing in middle school and have been discussing the differences between “argument” and “persuasion.” We currently have a unit in our curriculum units around persuasive writing and have been talking about claims and proof vs. emotional appeal. We were wondering your thoughts on the subject as we transition to the Common Core.

It’s a “both/and” situation. Successful persuasion relies both upon the argument-evidence formula of argumentative writing and also the emotional appeal of persuasive writing.

At the argumentative level, students must be able to evaluate whether or not a claim (such as a newspaper headline) is supported by evidence. IT’s the classic “make an argument, break an argument” critical thinking challenge, and most daily newspapers and web sites offer real-world examples for teachers to use. It’s useful when teachers help students take that material and separate it out into “claims”, “arguments” and “evidence.” Then they can evaluate competing claims, arguments, and evidence.

However, evidentiary claims are not always the end of the argument. On some topics, such as the death penalty or childhood vaccinations, the statistics alone do not resolve the argument. If the death penalty is, overall, administered in a statistically...

Thommie Piercy, Ph.D.
10/14/2011
  1. by: Blog Posts
  2. by: Blog Posts
  3. by: Instruction
  4. by: Leadership
  5. by: Standards

Literacy is exploding with complexity and opportunities! Today’s literacy needs, in conjunction with expectations in the Common Core State Standards, call for explicit and direct literacy instruction. In particular, Disciplinary Literacy instruction increases students’ comprehension of increasing levels of complex text, as demanded in Standard 10. This type of instruction may represent a significant change for English Language Arts teachers and teachers in different disciplines, as indicated in Achieve’s, On the Road to Implementation, (2010).

One question that has arisen is how Disciplinary Literacy instruction coexists with Reading Across the Content strategies. What Disciplinary Literacy experts and studies have disclosed is the lack of generalizability of strategies. That is, secondary students require discipline-specific instructional support as text complexity increases, as noted in the groundbreaking work by experts including the Shanahans: “In literacy development, progression to higher levels in the pyramid means learning more sophisticated but less generalizable skills and routines.” This passage continues, “By the time adolescent students are being challenged by disciplinary texts, literacy instruction often had evaporated altogether or has degenerated into a reiteration of general reading strategies" (Harvard Ed. Review, 2008). As text...

Thommie Piercy, Ph.D.
09/08/2011
  1. by: Blog Posts
  2. by: Leadership
  3. by: Standards

The ELA Common Core State Standards provide enormous opportunities for all students while creating challenges for instruction. With Standard 10 establishing the high expectation that all students read and understand complex text, the key word receiving much attention is, “all.” Yes, the expectation is for every student to independently read complex texts with understanding from Grade 2 through Grade 11 and into College and Careers. Currently, the most frequently asked questions revolve around Standard 10. These questions include, “How can I provide instruction to support my students’ capacity to read complex text?”Also, “Specifically, how can I support my students, who entered my classroom not reading on their enrolled grade level, to read such difficult texts in my content area, (including History/Social Studies, Science/Technical Subjects, Mathematics, and English Language Arts?”

In addition to providing student access to complex text by providing text-dependent, discipline-specific questions, as described in an earlier blog, guiding students to improve their close reading of text increases their understanding of complex text. Questions which focus directly on the text require students to practice close reading.

What is Close Reading?

Close Reading is keeping your eyes on the text to read the content very carefully, paying attention to details. Being quite different from a...

Thommie Piercy, Ph.D.
Thomasina Piercy, Ph.D.
09/01/2011
  1. by: Blog Posts
  2. by: Instruction

Among the highest priorities of the Common Core State Standards is that students must read texts closely and acquire knowledge.

  • At each grade level, 80 to 90 percent of the Reading standards require text-dependent analysis. Questions that expect student responses to be text-dependent and discipline-specific require students to demonstrate that they understand the text details and can provide accurate evidence.
  • Questions that are text-dependent can only be answered correctly by close reading of the text. The evidence in the response comes directly from the text and does not depend on additional information from other sources. Although there is an important role for questions requiring a synthesis of information from a variety of sources, text-dependent questions assure knowledge from a specific text is clearly understood prior to leaping into synthesizing. This level of scrutiny of text increases expectations for accuracy for future thinking, which may include synthesizing, analyzing, and creating. It builds the critical foundation of knowledge needed for comprehending texts used in higher grade levels. Text-dependent questions are not the same as recall questions. They require understanding that extends beyond recalling basic facts. The use of inference is an important skill for close reading. Consider which of the following questions requires students to read text closely for text specific information:
    1. How did Frederick Douglass’...
David Nagel
06/27/2011
  1. by: Blog Posts
  2. by: Instruction

Are you or the fellow science educators you support in need of effective instructional strategies and activities specifically related to teaching science? As one of the ‘newer’ topics on the accountability platform of NCLB, teaching science effectively requires a unique set of skills and practices for teachers to employ. As a former biology teacher and administrator, I found Five Easy Steps to a Balanced Science Program, by Lynn Howard, to be full of effective strategies for all educators, new and veteran. Lynn’s resource offers a multitude of interactive strategies for both the students and the teacher, as well as for administrators and instructional specialists to support and coach effective science classroom practice.

What also makes this series so effective and practical is Lynn’s examples which differentiate between lessons targeted for primary, upper elementary, middle school, and high school levels. While the framework is the same, these concrete examples allow for teachers and leaders to have specific models to build off of and implement in their classrooms. They are correlated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science process skills, which demonstrates the relevance and direct link to what teachers need to be successful in serving their students.

The five steps Lynn outlines in the series are:

  1. Establishing an Effective Science Environment
  2. Problem Solving
  3. Conceptual...
X
Loading